Posted by Stuff Blogger in Why don't we live underground? on Saturday, July 25, 2009



Posted by Stuff Blogger in Technology, Top 5 Energy-efficient Computers, Top 5s on Tuesday, July 21, 2009



Posted by Nirav Ashara in Bonus Post, Why do eggs turn hard when you boil them? on Friday, July 17, 2009

- Heat - When you heat an egg, the proteins gain energy and literally shake apart the bonds between the parts of the amino-acid strings, causing the proteins to unfold. As the temperature increases, the proteins gain enough energy to form new, stronger bonds (covalent) with other protein molecules. When you boil an egg, the heat first breaks (unfolds) the proteins, and then allows the proteins to link to other proteins. As the proteins form these new, strong bonds, the water that surrounded each protein molecule when the egg was liquid is forced out. That's why the egg turns hard. (Heat affects all of the proteins in an egg, so it's the best way to cook an egg.)
- Chemicals - You can also break the weak bonds between protein molecules with chemicals. According to an experiment done by the BBC Science Shack, if you put vodka on an egg white, the alcohol in it breaks weak hydrogen bonds in the protein. If you put vinegar on an egg white, the acid in it breaks ionic bonds. If you mix the two (vodka and vinegar), you break both types of bonds and quite effectively denature the protein. Lots of other chemicals will also break those weak bonds. This won't work as well on the yolk, which, while also protein-rich, has lots of fats and other properties that make it more difficult for it to become hard.
Posted by Nirav Ashara in 5 Ways to Avoid Overheating Your Truck, Top 5s
5 Ways to Avoid Overheating Your Truck



Posted by Nirav Ashara in 5 Tips for Restoring Old Furniture, Top 5s on Thursday, July 16, 2009
5 Tips for Restoring Old Furniture



- Wood glue
- Wood putty
- Oil soap
- Measuring tape
- Gloves
- Respirator
- Two to three inch (5.08 to 7.62 centimeters) angled paint brush
- Toothbrush
- Toothpicks
Posted by Nirav Ashara in How the Obesity Paradox Works on Tuesday, July 14, 2009

- Less than 18.5 = underweight
- 18.5 to 24.9 = normal weight
- 25 to 29.9 = overweight
- More than 30 = obese


- The numbers of people studied in the reports of the obesity paradox were generally small. Therefore, do these results apply or hold in much larger populations?
- The statistical techniques show associations between factors, but not cause-and-effect conclusions. So, the results may or may not be real.
- In many studies, congestive heart failure was diagnosed from clinical symptoms (difficulty breathing, swelling in extremities) instead of from laboratory tests (like echocardiography, cardiopulmonary testing, cardiac catheterization).
- These clinical criteria to diagnose congestive heart failure have not been validated in obese populations and may not be applicable.
- In some of the studies where lab tests were done, the obese patients had slightly better heart functions (pumping ability, oxygen delivery) than normal or underweight patients.
- Therefore, the obese patients may have been either slightly "healthier" with respect to CHF or in earlier stages of CHF than their normal/underweight counterparts. So obese survival rates were better.
- Congestive heart failure (and chronic kidney disease) is a wasting disease. Patients are so sick that they lose weight (fat, muscle mass) over the course of the disease. This could lead to two conclusions:
- Again, obese patients could be "healthier" or in earlier stages of these chronic diseases. Chronic disease patients with low BMIs do not have low BMIs intentionally, but because of the nature of the wasting disease. None of the studies discriminated between intentional weight loss (from diet and exercise) and unintentional weight loss (from disease).
- Obese patients may have a better metabolic reserve than their normal/underweight counterparts.
- Few of the studies looked at extreme obesity (BMI more than 35). In some studies that did, the extremely obese did not have a greater chance of survival than the underweight. Therefore, the survival curves may be U-shaped. Normal and overweight patients would have better survival probabilities than those at the extremes -- underweight and extremely obese.
- Some recent studies have questioned whether BMI is the best way to categorize obesity. Maybe waist circumference or waist-to-hip circumference ratios may be better indicators of obesity. These criteria are based on observations that body fat stored in the waist is worse with respect to the risks of obesity than fat stored elsewhere.

- The adverse effects of obesity take more time to develop than those of chronic disease (heart failure, kidney disease). Therefore, the consequences of wasting kill patients much faster than obesity does.
- In both CHF and chronic kidney disease, malnutrition and inflammation are common. These conditions alone could reduce the survival of these patients. Therefore, weight gain could be an indicator of better nutrition and, therefore, improved chances of survival in obese patients.

Posted by Nirav Ashara in How Wind-up Cell Phone Chargers Work on Monday, July 13, 2009
How Wind-up Cell Phone Chargers Work


